Wintra Tama Kencana, jakaria ,


The purpose of this paper is to analyze structure, conduct, efficiency and performance of construction industry and also the effect of market share (MS), efficiency (Ef), and company size (Size) towards the Return of Asset (ROA) of construction sector (go public) in Indonesia. The method that is used is Structure, Conduct and Performance (SCP) approach. Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) is used to analyze the efficiency of construction sector. Quantitative analysis is used to discover the structure and performance of construction sector in Indonesia. The data were obtained from the Indonesian Stock Exchange. The data obtained and used in this paper are secondary data, which includes net profit, total asset, fixed asset, revenue and labor. The period which this paper covers is 2010 – 2015 (6 years). The result of SCP analysis shows that the structure of the construction sector in Indonesia is a strict oligopoly, with the average CR4 value above 50 percent. Conduct analysis in construction sector can be cooperate with competitors, pricing and promotion. While the performance of construction sector can be seen from its ROA, efficiency (Ef), and company size.


Structure, Conduct and Performance (SCP), concentration ratio (CR4), Marker Share (MS) efficiency (Ef), Return of Asset (ROA), Firm Size (Size)

Full Text:


Article Metrics

Abstract views : 0| PDF views : 0


Asosiasi Kontraktor Nasional. 2015. Industri Jasa Konstruksi di Indonesia Masih didominasi Pengusaha Asing. (Diakses pada tanggal 10 Agustus 2016 )

Bhattacharyya, S., & Saxena, A. (2009). Does the firm size matter? An empirical enquiry into the performance of Indian Manufacturing Firms. MPRA Paper No. 13029

Bursa Efek Indonesia. 2016. Laporan Keuangan Tahunan. Jakarta: Bursa Efek Indonesia, Available online at

Case, Karl E & Ray C Fair. 2008. Prinsip-Prinsip Ekonomi Mikro (7th ed). Indeks Gramedia. Jakarta

Coelli, TJ. 1996. A Guide to DEAP Version 2.1 : A Data Envelopment Analysis (Computer) Program. Centre for Efficiency and Productivity Analysis (CEPA) Working Papers Vol.8 No.96. Australia: University of New England. ISBN 86389 4969

Farell, 1957. Pengantar Makroekonomi Edisi 10, Jilid 1. Jakarta: Lembaga Penerbit.

Ferry, M.G., dan Jones, W.H. (1979). Determinants of financial structure: A new methodological approach. Journal of Finance, 01 XXXXIV(3)

Jaya, Wihana Kirana 2008. Pengantar Ekonomi Industri, Pendekatan Struktur, Perilaku dan Kinerja Pasar., BPFE.

Long, L.H., Young, D.L., & Jun, Y.L. (2008). Delays and cost overrun in Vietnam large construction projects : A comparasion with other selected countries. KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, 12, 3 67-377.

Nicholson, Walter. 2004. Mikroekonomi Intermediate dan Aplikasinya. Jakarta: Erlangga.

Nurhasanah. 2012. Pengaruh Struktur Modal terhadap Profitabilitas pada Perusahaan Manufaktur yang Terdaftar Di Bursa Efek Indonesia (BEI). Jurnal Ilmiah, Vol 4(3): Hal. 31-39.

Peeters, W. Madauss, B. (2008) A proposed strategy against cost overrun in the space sector. The 5C Approach. Space Policy, 24, 80-89.

Supriati,Sri Budiwati dan Siti Dwi Nuraini, 2009. Pengaruh Pangsa Pasar, Rasio Leverage dan Rasio Intensitas Modal pada Return Sahan. Universitas Pembangunan Nasional “Veteran”. Yogyakarta.

Taunay,Edward Gagah Purwana. 2007. Analisis pengaruh capital adequacy ratio (CAR), loan to deposit ratio (LDR), size, bopo terhadap profitabilitas (studi perbandingan pada bank domestic dan bank asing periode januari 2003-desember 2007) Semarang: Fakultas Ekonomi Universitas Pandanaran.



  • There are currently no refbacks.

Copyright (c) 2019 Media Ekonomi

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.


View My Stats