PENGARUH KOMPONEN-KOMPONEN FRAUD STAR TERHADAP KORUPSI DENGAN SISTEM PENGENDALIAN INTERN PEMERINTAH (SPIP) SEBAGAI VARIABEL MODERASI

Ulfah apriani

Abstract


This study aims to examine the influence of fraud star components to corruption with the government internal control system (SPIP) as a moderation variable. The sample used in this study was 230 respondents to the Judges, Employees and Auditors of the Indonesian Supreme Court. The test is carried out using Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) analysis, the data is processed using Partial Least Square (PLS) on the Windows 10 version of the SmartPLS3.2.8. The result of the research shows that pressure has a positive effect on corruption, opportunity has a positive effect on corruption, rationalization has a positive effect on corruption, the ability to have a positive effect on corruption and integrity has a negatif effect on corruption. The government internal control system weakens the positive influence of pressure on corruption, the government internal control system does not weaken the positive influence of opportunity on corruption, the government internal control system does not weaken the positive influence of rationalization on corruption, the government internal control system does not weaken the positive influence of the ability to corruption and the internal control system the government does not strengthen the negative influence of integrity on corruption. The government internal control system (SPIP) in the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia must be able to be adapted to the COSO theory because the Supreme Court is a government institution that has special charecteristics where as a law enforcer has the authority to decide a case.


Keywords


Pressure, Opportunity, Rationalization, Ability, Integrity, Government Internal Control System, Corruption, The Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia

Full Text:

PDF

Article Metrics

Abstract views : 400| PDF views : 0

References


Abdullahi, R., & Mansor, N. (2018). Fraud prevention initiatives in the Nigerian public sector. Journal of Financial Crime, 25(2), 527–544. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFC-02-2015-0008

ACFE. (2016). Report to the Nation on Occupational Fraud and Abuse. ACFE.

Aksa, A. F. (2018). Pencegahan dan Deteksi Kasus Korupsi pada Sektor Publik dengan Fraud Triangle. Jurnal Ekonomi, Bisnis, Dan Akuntansi (JEBA), 20(4). Retrieved from http://jp.feb.unsoed.ac.id/index.php/jeba/article/view/1238

Alam, M. M., Johari, R. J., & Said, J. (2018). An Empirical Assessment of Employee Integrity in The Public Sector of Malaysia. International Journal of Ethics and Systems, 34(4), 458–471.

Albrecht, W. S., Albrecht, C. O., Albrecht, C. C., & Zimbelman, M. F. (2012). Fraud examination (fourth). OH, USA: South Western Cengage Learning.

Aswad, H., Hasan, A., & Indrawati, N. (2018). Faktor-Faktor yang Mempengaruhi Kecenderungan Kecurangan Akuntansi Dengan Keefektifan Pengendalian Internal Sebagai Variabel Moderasi. Jurnal Akuntansi, 6(2).

Bologna, J. (1993). Handbook of Corporate Fraud. Boston: Butterworth‐ Heinemann.

Cressey, D, R. (n.d.). Other People’s Money. Belmont, California: Wadsworth Publishing Company, Inc.

Darmawan, A., & Darwanis. (2018). Pengaruh Sistem Pengendalian Internal, Pemanfaatan Teknologi, Kompetensi Sumber Daya Manusia dan Penerapan Sistem Akuntansi Keuangan Daerah terhadap Kualitas Laporan Keuangan SKPA Provinsi Aceh. Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Ekonomi Akuntansi (JIMEKA), 3(1), 9–19.

Dewi, K. Y. K., & Ratnadi, N. M. D. (2017). Pengaruh Pengendalian Internal Dan Integritas Pada Kecenderungan Kecurangan Akuntansi Satuan Kerja Perangkat Daerah Kota Denpasar. E-Jurnal Akuntansi Universitas Udayana, 18(2), 917–941.

Ghozali, I. (2015). Partial least squares: Konsep, Teknik dan Aplikasi Menggunakan Program SmartPLS 3.0 untuk Penelitian Empiris. Semarang: Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro.

Hair, J, F., Babin, B, J., & Krey, N. (2017). Covariance-Based Structural Equation Modeling. Journal of Advertising: Review and Recommendations, 46(1), 163–177.

Jaka, I., Indayani, & Budiyoni, E. (2018). Studi tentang Teori GONE dan Pengaruhnya terhadap Fraud dengan Idealisme Pimpinan sebagai Variabel Moderasi: Studi pada Pengadaan Barang/Jasa di Pemerintahan. Jurnal Dinamika Akuntansi Dan Bisnis, 5(1), 31–42.

Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the Firm: Managerial. Journal of Financial Economics, 3, 305–360. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(76)90026-X

Ruankaew, T. (2016). Beyond the Fraud Diamond. International Journal of Business Management & Economic Research, 7(1), 474–476.

Sanusi, Z, M., Mohamed, N., Omar, N., & Nassir, M. (2015). Effects of Internal Controls, Fraud Motives and Experience in Assessing Likelihood of Fraud Risk. Journal of Economics, Business and Management, 3(2).

Sekaran, U., & Bougie, R. (2018). Research Methods for Business: A Skill Building Approach (7th ed.; U. K. Wiley, Ed.). Chichester.

sipp.pn-bengkulu.go.id. (n.d.).

Tuanakotta, Theodorus, M. (2007). Akuntansi Forensik dan Audit Investigatif (L. P. F. E. universitas Indonesia, Ed.). Jakarta.

Umar, H. (2017). Corruption the Devil. Jakarta: Penerbit Universitas Trisakti.

Umar, H., & Irsan, M. N. (2018). The Influence of the Government Internal Control System and Internal Audit on Corruption Prevention Mediated By Implementation of Actuals-Based Accountung. Saudi Journal of Business and Management Studies (SJBMS), 3(3).

Wolfe, D. T., & Hermanson, D. R. (2004). The Fraud Diamond : Considering the Four Elements of Fraud: Certified Public Accountant. The CPA Journal, 74(12), 38–42. https://doi.org/DOI:

Wulandari, D. N., & Nuryanto, M. (2018). Pengaruh Pengendalian Internal, Kesadaran Anti-Fraud, Integritas, Independensi, dan Profesionalisme Terhadap Pencegahan Kecurangan. Jurnal Riset Akuntansi Mercu Buana, 4(2), 117. https://doi.org/10.26486/jramb.v4i2.557

Zamzam, I., Mahdi, S., & Ansar, R. (2017). Pengaruh diamond fraud dan tingkat religiuitas terhadap kecurangan akademik (studi pada mahasiswa S-1 di lingkungan perguruan tinggi se kota Ternate). Jurnal Ilmiah Akuntansi Peradaban, 3(2), 1–24.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.25105/jmat.v7i1.6311

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.