ANTESEDEN DAN KONSEKUENSI DARI PRICE SATISFACTION

Steven Dharma, Asep Hermawan

Abstract


The purpose of this paper is to explore the antecedents and consequents of price satisfaction. It argues that price satisfaction is composed of several dimensions (price transparency, pricequality ratio, relative price, price confidence, price reliability, and price fairness) and that companies should consider these dimensions when monitoring customer price satisfaction.
Based on a theoretical discussion of the price dimensions, a questionnaire is developed that measures customer satisfaction with individual price dimensions. Using structural equation model analysis, the impact of price satisfaction dimensions on overall price satisfaction is measured, using a sample of 100 respondent that also customers from several car workshops.
The research was analyzed with Structural Equation Model to analyze the path effect between the variable to answer the hypothesis testing. Before doing the structural equation model, the
data was tested with instrument testing, consist of validity and reliability test. Goodness fit measure was also used to make sure that the structural equation model in good fit condition.
The result showed that price satisfaction, price confidence, price quality ratio, price fairness, and price transparency have significant effect toward price satisfaction. The relative price variable didn’t have significant effect toward price satisfaction. For the price satisfaction toward word of mouth, also didn’t give significant result. Based on the measurement of price satisfaction, managers are able to identify the drivers of price satisfaction, their satisfaction and relative importance in different market segments and, consequently they are able to take the right measures to increase customer satisfaction and word of mouth.
Keywords : Price satisfaction, word of mouth, car workshop.

Keywords


Price satisfaction, word of mouth, car workshop.

Full Text:

PDF

Article Metrics

Abstract views : 483| PDF views : 0

References


Ayres, I. and Nalebuff, B. (2003), “In praise of honest pricing”, MIT Sloan

Management Review, Vol. 45 No. 1, pp. 24-8.

Compeau, L.D. and Grewal, D. (1994), “Adding value by communicating price deals effectively: does it matter how you phrase it?”, Pricing Strategy &

Practice, Vol. 2 No. 2, pp. 28-36.

Fornell, C., Johnson, M., Anderson, E.W., Cha, J. and Everitt Bryant, B. (1996), “The American customer satisfaction index: nature, purpose, and findings”, Journal of Marketing, Vol. 60, pp. 7-18.

Gale, B.T. (1994), Managing Customer Value, The Free Press, New York, NY.

Hallowell, R. (1996), “The relationship of customer satisfaction, customer

loyalty and profitability: an empirical study”, International Journal of Service

Industry Management, Vol. 7 No. 4, pp. 27-42.

Hanna, N., & Wozniak, G., Consumer Behavior: An Applied Approach. New Jersey : Prentice Hall. 2001

Hermawan, Asep (2006). Pedoman Praktis Metodologi Penelitian Bisnis, LPFE.

Keaveney, S.M. (1995), “Customer behavior in services industries: an exploratory study”, Journal of Marketing, Vol. 59 No. 2, pp. 71-82.

Lam, S.Y., Shankar, V., Erramilli, K.M. and Murthy, B. (2004), “Customer value, satisfaction, loyalty, and switching costs: an illustration from a businessto-business service context”, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Vol. 32 No. 3, pp. 293-311.

Martins, M. and Monroe, K.B. (1994), “Perceived price fairness: a new look

at an old construct”, in Allen, C.T. and John, D.R. (Eds), Advances in

consumer research,Vol. 21, Association for Consumer Research, Provo, UT, pp. 75-90.

Matzler, K., Hinterhuber, H.H., Daxer, C. and Huber, M. (2005), “The relationship between customer satisfaction and shareholder value”, Total Quality Management and Business Excellence, Vol. 16 No. 5, pp. 1-10.

Merrick, A. (2001a), “Target and Kmart both claim victory in spat over ‘dare to compare’ ads”, The Wall Street Journal, September 4, pp. B1, B4.

Merrick, A. (2001b), “Target sues Kmart claiming ads misstate prices in comparisons”, The Wall Street Journal, August 22, p.B6.

Oh, H. (2003), “Price fairness and its asymmetric effects on overall price, quality, and valued judgments: the case of an upscale hotel”, Tourism

Management, Vol. 24, pp. 387-99.

Sirdeshmukh, D., Singh, J. and Sabol, B. (2002), “Consumer trust, value, and loyalty in relational exchanges”, Journal of Marketing, Vol. 66 No. 1, pp. 15-37.

Sternquist, B., Byun, S.-E. and Jin, B. (2004), “The dimensionality of price perceptions: a cross-cultural comparison of Asian consumers”, International Review of Retail, Distribution & Consumer Research, Vol. 14 No. 1, pp. 83-100.

Sutisna (2001), Perilaku Konsumen dan Komunikasi Pemasaran, Bandung : PT Remaja Rosdakarya

Urban, G.L. (2003), Customer Advocacy: Is it for You, MIT, Cambridge, MA.

Urbany, J.E., Kalapurakal, R. and Dickson, P.R. (1996), “Price search in the retail grocery market”, Journal of Marketing, Vol. 60, pp. 91-104.

Varki, S. and Colgate, M. (2001), “The role of price perceptions in an integrated model of behavioral intentions”, Journal of Service Research, Vol. 3 No. 2, pp. 232-40.

Woodruff, R.R. and Gardial, S.F. (1996), Know Your Customer: New Approaches to

Xia, L., Monroe, K.B. and Cox, J.L. (2004), “The price is unfair! A conceptual

framework of price fairness perceptions”, Journal of Marketing, Vol. 68 No. 4, pp. 1-15.

Zeithaml, V.A. (1988), “Consumer perceptions of price, quality, and value: a meansend model and synthesis of evidence”, Journal of Marketing, Vol. 52, pp. 2-22.

Zeithaml, V.A. (2000), “Service quality, profitability, and the economic worth

of customers: what we know and what we need to learn”, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Vol. 28 No. 1, pp. 67-85.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.25105/jmpj.v5i1.489

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Copyright (c) 2016 Manajemen dan Pemasaran Jasa



Lisensi Creative Commons

Jurnal manajemen dan pemasaran jasa  Lisensi Creative Commons Atribusi-NonKomersial 4.0 Internasional.